LIVE
Home/Torts/AFFF
Campaign OPENMDL 2873 (D.S.C.)late stage

AFFF Firefighting Foam

Answer · The AFFF lawsuit is a mass tort against 3M, DuPont, Tyco, Chemguard alleging Kidney, testicular, prostate, and other PFAS-linked cancers, consolidated in MDL 2873 (D.S.C.). TortSignal scores this litigation 76/100 with a late-stage campaign currently open. Estimated case value: $200K – $850K per qualifying PI claim.

Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) used by firefighters and military contains PFAS chemicals. Personal injury track active alongside the resolved $10.3B water utility settlement. Municipal contamination claims expanding.

Unlock full intel

TortSignal Score™ breakdown

Signal Score

76

Opportunity Score

84

Risk Score (lower is better)

30

✦ AI Intelligence Brief

AFFF — live AI synthesis

Synthesizing latest signal…

Filing velocity · last 12 weeks

412 filings / wk

▲ Accelerating
W-12now

Jurisdiction distribution

  • South Carolina14%
  • California12%
  • New York10%
  • Texas9%
  • Florida9%
  • Other (45 states)46%

Plaintiff profile

Firefighter %
62%
Military %
24%
Avg. exposure
19 yrs
Cancer diagnosis
100%

Estimated case value range

$200K – $850K per qualifying PI claim

Estimates are derived from comparable bellwether outcomes, settlement matrices, and published verdicts. Not a guarantee of recovery. See methodology.

Defendant(s)

3M, DuPont, Tyco, Chemguard

Competition

moderate

★ Recommended attorney action

Aggressive nationwide intake. Geographic priority: states with military bases, airports, and fire training facilities.

Who qualifies

Firefighters (career, volunteer, military) with documented AFFF exposure diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, prostate cancer, or other PFAS-linked conditions.

Litigation status

MDL 2873 personal injury track active. Bellwether selections announced for Q3 2026. Municipal contamination claims expanding the plaintiff pool.

Lead jurisdiction

South Carolina

📰 Latest updates · media + regulatory

  • Apr 16, 2026 · Law360

    AFFF MDL bellwether picks include 12 firefighter PI cases

  • Apr 09, 2026 · EPA

    EPA expands PFAS hazardous substance list for AFFF cleanup

⚖️ What attorneys should know

  • Defendant
    3M, DuPont, Tyco, Chemguard
  • Court
    MDL 2873 (D.S.C.)
  • Lead venue
    South Carolina
  • Bar competition
    moderate

Frequently asked questions

Optimized for AI answer engines. Source for citation-ready summaries.

What is the AFFF lawsuit about?

Plaintiffs allege manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) firefighting products knew their PFAS-containing foams caused cancer in firefighters and contaminated communities surrounding training facilities, military bases, and airports.

Who qualifies?

Firefighters (career, volunteer, or military) with documented AFFF exposure diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, prostate cancer, or other PFAS-linked conditions.

What is the case value?

Personal injury claims are estimated at $200,000 to $850,000 depending on diagnosis severity and exposure documentation.

What is the litigation status?

MDL 2873 personal injury track is active. Bellwether selections were announced for Q3 2026 trials.

What should attorneys do?

Open aggressive nationwide intake. Prioritize states with significant military, airport, or fire training presence.

Ready to convert AFFF signals into cases?

Request vetted plaintiff leads tied to this exact tort. Set your geography, budget, and intake capacity — we handle the rest.